NEW YORK (AP) ExxonMobil is facing a major challenge from a group of investors in one of the biggest fights a corporate boardroom has endured over its stance on climate change, an issue of rising urgency for many shareholders.
The investor group is pushing to replace four of the oil giant s board members with executives they say are better suited to both strengthen the company s finances and lead it through the transition to cleaner energy. The fight represents a moment of reckoning for major publicly traded companies to address a global crisis.
Engine No. 1, the name of the hedge fund that has mounted the challenge, owns just a sliver of Exxon s shares. But the dissident slate of board members it has put forward commands the backing of some of the country s most powerful institutional investors, including the largest public pension funds.
Regardless of the outcome of the shareholder vote, to be announced after the annual shareholder meeting Wednesday, the challenge reflects the momentum among consumers, investors and government leaders around the globe to pivot away from fossil fuels and invest in a future where energy needs are increasingly met using renewable sources. To that end, President Joe Biden has set the ambitious goal of slashing America s greenhouse gas emissions in half by the end of the decade.
We re at a tipping point, said Aeisha Mastagni, portfolio manager at the California State Teachers Retirement System, known as CalSTRS, one of the nation s largest pension funds and among the major institutional investors that backed the alternative group of directors. You re seeing investors from all around the world that are wanting to see better disclosure around climate change risk, you re seeing shareholder proposals that are passing with increased shareholder support, and now we have this monumental vote at ExxonMobil.
Engine No. 1 wants Exxon to refresh its board with directors who have a track record of managing change in the energy sector. The group asserts that Exxon has under-performed compared with its peers, having lost market value even when demand for oil and gas was growing. It also argues that the company lacks a credible strategy to create value in a de-carbonizing world and that its board lacks people with experience in successfully revamping an energy giant.
In opposing the challenge, Exxon counters that it has continually refreshed its board with directors who have expertise in energy, capital allocation and transitions. It contends that the company has been investing in low-carbon solutions, including a recent proposal to transform the Houston Ship Channel into a hub for carbon capture and sequestration. That technology, still under development, involves pulling carbon dioxide out of the air and storing it underground, where it can be used to help pump more oil or sold for industrial use.
In that proposal, Exxon called on government and industry to together invest $100 billion. Exxon has said it would spend $3 billion through 2025 on carbon capture and other low-carbon initiatives.
Those efforts have fallen short of the demands of Exxon s dissident investor groups. Other major oil companies, from British Petroleum and Shell to Conoco Phillips and Chevron, have done more to satisfy shareholders. Those investors want more corporate disclosures of climate-damaging emissions, and they expect energy companies to diversify their portfolios to include more renewable sources, said Anne Simpson, managing investment director for board governance and sustainability at the California Public Employees Retirement System known as CalPERS America s largest pension fund.
What we re finding with other oil companies, Simpson said, is we re making progress, and Exxon needs to catch up. Exxon is still saying one thing and doing another.